Pretesh Biswas has wealth of qualifications and experience in providing results-oriented solutions for your system development, training or auditing needs. He has helped dozens of organizations in implementing effective management systems to a number of standards. He provide a unique blend of specialized knowledge, experience, tools and interactive skills to help you develop systems that not only get certified, but also contribute to the bottom line. He has taught literally hundreds of students over the past 5 years.
He has experience in training at hundreds of organizations in several industry sectors. His training is unique in that which can be customized as to your management system and activities and deliver them at your facility.
This greatly accelerates the learning curve and application of the knowledge acquired. He is now ex-Certification body lead auditor now working as consultancy auditor. He has performed hundreds of audits in several industry sectors. As consultancy auditor, he not just report findings, but provide value-added service in recommending appropriate solutions. Training: He has delivered public and on-site quality management training to over students.
Other services: He has provided business planning, restructuring, asset management, systems and process streamlining services to a variety of manufacturing and service clients such as printing, plastics, automotive, transportation and custom brokerage, warehousing and distribution, electrical and electronics, trading, equipment leasing, etc.
Prior to becoming a business consultant 6 years ago, he has worked in several portfolios such as Marketing, operations, production, Quality and customer care. He is also certified in Six Sigma Black belt. View all posts by preteshbiswas. Hello there! Looking at this post reminds me of my previous roommate!
He always kept talking about this. I most certainly will send this article to him. Pretty sure he will have a very good read. Thanks for sharing! Like Like. You are commenting using your WordPress. You are commenting using your Google account. You are commenting using your Twitter account. You are commenting using your Facebook account. Notify me of new comments via email. Notify me of new posts via email.
TPM is acceptable. Public data may be read by anyone. The University of Queensland. Supplemental Resources A Member of. Need Help? Data quality at the time of creation is the primary responsibility of the Information Creator and must be compliant with the overarching policies and procedures. If deploying a system which supports encryption at rest, this functionality should be enabled and used. Systems should support encryption at rest, and it should be enabled and used.
Systems must be kept in secure facilities with physical access control and mitigation such as alarms, surveillance and guard patrols. Consider disabling features such as the ability to allow public access to data, for systems which support this e.
Hardware purchased or used for storage should be tracked down to individual disks via the UQ asset management system where possible with HDD serial numbers recorded where possible. Loss of hardware due to theft or misplacement should be detected quickly and reported to appropriate person up chain of command. Regular review of access control policy e. Local copies of data should not be made to portable devices.
Data should remain on UQ managed endpoints. Systems that support audit trail features, should have these enabled.
Detection and monitoring should be in place for phishing or credential compromise of users with data access. Also refer to the Application Security Standard. Designs involving a large internal trust domain e. Systems must support encryption at rest, and it must be enabled and used. Keys for encryption should not be kept solely with the disks in the same system: at least part of the key should be stored outside the physical chassis. In some cases, physical security controls may be considered as the basis for an exemption for this requirement.
Must disable features such as the ability to allow public access to data, for systems which support this e. Hardware purchased or used for storage must be tracked down to individual disks via the UQ asset management system where possible with HDD serial numbers recorded where possible.
Loss of hardware due to theft or misplacement must be detected quickly and reported to appropriate person up chain of command. Regular reviews of access control policy e. Local copies of data must not be made to portable devices.
Data must remain on UQ managed endpoints on the UQ secured networks. Systems must support audit trail features, must have these enabled, and must be monitored for unusual activity. Audit trails should be stored separately in a tamper-proof fashion for a minimum retention period.
Detection and monitoring must be in place for phishing or credential compromise of users with data access. Procurement and tender processes must evaluate controls and mitigations implemented by external providers to ensure their equivalence to the minimum requirements set out in this procedure and relevant standards. Including these requirements in any formal contract should be strongly considered. System components which communicate over a network connection internally must treat that traffic as though it contains data at the same classification level as the highest stored within that system and therefore must implement appropriate controls and mitigations for data transmission such as authentication, TLS etc.
The University should solicit legal advice on the obligations of data storage providers prior to signing contracts. Systems must implement mechanisms to automatically detect and mitigate bulk exfiltration of data e. Regular penetration testing of systems must be carried out and all findings acted upon. Regular reviews of vendor contracts to evaluate their ongoing compliance with this procedure and future versions of it must be carried out.
Systems must not place credentials or authorisation tokens in log files or audit records. Keys for encryption must not be kept solely with the disks in the same system; at least part of the key must be stored outside the physical chassis. Audit trails must be stored separately in a tamper-proof fashion for a minimum retention period. Automated actions such as account suspension and limits should be taken in response to anomalous behaviour.
Device factors with strong anti-cloning and anti-tampering features are highly recommended e. Common Criteria EAL4 or higher. System components which communicate over a network connection internally must treat that traffic as though it contains data at the same classification level as the highest stored within that system and therefore must implement appropriate controls and mitigations for data transmission such as authentication, TLS, etc.
Must carry out regular reviews of vendor contracts to evaluate their ongoing compliance with this procedure and future versions of it. If data is subject to copyright, permission should be obtained from the copyright holder before transmission. Data in transit should be protected by cryptographic security mechanisms which provide confidentiality and integrity, where systems support it and implementation cost is not prohibitive.
TLS is recommended. Data in transit should be protected by cryptographic security mechanisms which provide confidentiality and integrity. Mechanisms that support forward secrecy should be preferred.
Network devices should be located in secure areas, ideally with monitoring. Regular inspections of key cabling runs and network devices looking for malicious changes or insertions should be carried out. National Diet Japan. Act on the protection of personal information, Act No.
National Diet Japan Amended act on the protection of personal information, Act No. Newman, Abraham L. Self-regulatory trajectories in the shadow of public power: Resolving digital dilemmas in Europe and the United States. Governance 17 3 : — Autonomy and trust in bioethics. Recommendation on cross-border co-operation in the enforcement of laws protecting privacy.
Guidelines on the protection of privacy and transborder flows of personal data. OECD science, technology and innovation outlook Pierre, Jon, ed. Debating governance: Authority, steering, and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Senden, Linda A. Soft law, self-regulation and co-regulation in European law: Where do they meet?
Electronic Journal of Comparative Law 9 1 : Stirrat, Gordon M. Journal of Medical Ethics 31 3 : — Overview of the 1st proceedings. Overview of the 2nd proceedings. Overview of the 10th proceedings. Overview of the 11th proceedings. Policy outline of the institutional revision for utilisation of personal data. Sweeney, Latanya. K-anonymity: A model for protecting privacy. Universal declaration on the human genome and human rights. Weiser, Philip J. The future of Internet regulation.
UC Davis Law Review — Towards an international dialogue on the institutional side of antitrust. Download references. You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar. Correspondence to Hiroyuki Nagai. Reprints and Permissions. Nagai, H. ABR 9, — Download citation. Published : 09 September Issue Date : October Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:.
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative. Skip to main content.
0コメント